Home / Central Data Catalog / WBG / WBG_JOR_2016_WBCS_V01_M / variable [F1]
WBG

World Bank Group Country Survey 2016

Jordan, 2016
Get Microdata
Reference ID
WBG_JOR_2016_WBCS_v01_M
Producer(s)
Public Opinion Research Group
Collections
The World Bank Microdata Library
Metadata
Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON
Created on
May 19, 2021
Last modified
May 19, 2021
Page views
16207
Downloads
510

Energy subsidy reform could lead to fiscal savings and make funds available for (k3_5)

Data file: jordan_fy16_datafile

Overview

Valid: 79
Invalid: 6
Type: Discrete
Decimal: 0
Start: 522
End: 522
Width: 1
Range: 0 - 1
Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Literal question
When thinking about energy subsidy reform in Jordan, which TWO of the following statements are most convincing?
- Energy subsidy reform could lead to fiscal savings and make funds available for more important social spending (e.g., education, health, social protection).
Categories
Value Category Cases
0 36
45.6%
1 43
54.4%
Sysmiss 6
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Back to Catalog